- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M13 vs Camon 19
Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Tecno Camon 19
What Galaxy M13 does better (7) and where Camon 19 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Display4.8
2.3Performance2.4
5.8Camera6.1
4.0Battery4.6
5.0Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M13Camon 19
| Galaxy M13 | Camon 19 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.4 mm | 166.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 74.4 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 198 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M13 better than Camon 19?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,522 vs 1,403+8%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 19: No
- Weight192 g vs 198 g+3%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 25%+20%
Why is Camon 19 better than Galaxy M13?
- AnTuTu score228,034 vs 306,873+35%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 500 nits+11%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.5% vs 88.6%+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 165.4 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Deep Green, Orange Copper, Light Blue | Eco Black, Sea Salt White, Digital Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 441 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.5% | 88.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 850 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 228,034 | 306,873 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,522 | 1,403 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.45 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI Core 4.1 | HIOS 13 |
