- android.gs
- Compare
- G96 vs Pova Slim
Motorola G96 vs Tecno Pova Slim
What G96 does better (12) and where Pova Slim wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
G96Pova Slim
| G96 | Pova Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.2 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.9 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 6 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 156 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G96 better than Pova Slim?
- AnTuTu score794,638 vs 613,165+30%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Slim: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Pova Slim: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,887 vs 1,988+45%
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+7%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Slim: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Pova Slim: No
- Dual SIMYes · Pova Slim: No
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Pova Slim better than G96?
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 4,500 nits2.8×
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- NFCNo · G96: Yes
- Weight178 g vs 156 g+14%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 440 ppi+11%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 6 mm+32%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Pantone (Greener Pastures, Cattleya Orchid, Dresden Blue, Ashleigh Blue) | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,578 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 794,638 | 613,165 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,887 | 1,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
