- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge+ (2023) vs Aquos R7s
Motorola Edge+ (2023) vs Sharp Aquos R7s
What Edge+ (2023) does better (19) and where Aquos R7s wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display8.3
9.1Camera6.8
8.2Battery5.4
9.7Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge+ (2023)Aquos R7s
| Edge+ (2023) | Aquos R7s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 161 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 9.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 208 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge+ (2023) better than Aquos R7s?
- Wired charging68 W vs 27 W2.5×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Aquos R7s: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos R7s: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R7s: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera60 MP vs 13 MP4.8×
- Main camera50 MP vs 47 MP+6%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R7s: No
- eSIMYes · Aquos R7s: No
Why is Aquos R7s better than Edge+ (2023)?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge+ (2023): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge+ (2023): Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 456 ppi+15%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 161 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Interstellar Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | PRO IGZO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,730 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 456 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 86.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,779,624 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,282 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 47 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 60 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 27 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | — |
