android.gs
Compare
Edge 70 Pro+ vs 15T Pro

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 15T Pro

What Edge 70 Pro+ does better (5) and where 15T Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2026Edge 70 Pro+

9.5Score

5 advantages≈ $570

Xiaomi · 202515T Pro

9.7Score

11 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

9.7Display9.7

8.7Performance9.0

9.6Camera9.8

9.2Battery9.2

8.4Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 70 Pro+15T Pro

	Edge 70 Pro+	15T Pro	Difference
Height	162.7 mm	162.7 mm	=
Width	75.6 mm	77.9 mm	−2.3 mm
Thickness	7.2 mm	8 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	190 g	210 g	−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 70 Pro+ better than 15T Pro?

Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+18%
Peak brightness5,200 nits vs 3,200 nits+62%
Weight190 g vs 210 g+11%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Thickness7.2 mm vs 8 mm+11%

Why is 15T Pro better than Edge 70 Pro+?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
AnTuTu score2,366,913 vs 2,683,380+13%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,900 vs 7,914+15%
Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
Max video4K vs 8K
eSIMNo · Edge 70 Pro+: Yes
CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+7%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 70 Pro+≈ $5709.5	Xiaomi 15T Pro≈ $5809.7
Design
Weight	190 g	210 g
Thickness	7.2 mm	8 mm
Height	162.7 mm	162.7 mm
Width	75.6 mm	77.9 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Eco leather	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Pantone: Stormy Sea (Green), Zinfandel (Red), Chicory Coffee (Wood)	Black, Gray, Mocha Gold
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,272 px	1,280 px
Resolution (height)	2,772 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	450 ppi	447 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	5,200 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,419 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	91.4%	90.4%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Extreme	Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.4 GHz	3.63 GHz
GPU	Mali-G720 MC8	Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score	2,366,913	2,683,380
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,900	7,914
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,887
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,500 mAh	5,500 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	16.4 h
Wired charging	90 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	83%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,600
Endurance per cycle	—	58 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A