- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 70 Fusion+ vs Camon 50 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion+ vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What Edge 70 Fusion+ does better (12) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.7
7.4Performance7.2
9.4Camera9.1
8.3Battery8.5
9.6Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 70 Fusion+Camon 50 Pro
| Edge 70 Fusion+ | Camon 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 77 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 175 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 70 Fusion+ better than Camon 50 Pro?
- Wired charging68 W vs 45 W+51%
- AnTuTu score1,129,182 vs 1,059,715+7%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 429 ppi+5%
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 4+62%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.3+13%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.8 mm+8%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,208 px+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.9% vs 89.6%+3%
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Edge 70 Fusion+?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge 70 Fusion+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Orient Blue, Sporting Green, Silhouette, Blue Surf | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.9% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,129,182 | 1,059,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,220 | 3,199 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
