- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 60 Neo vs RugOne Xever 7 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Neo vs UleFone RugOne Xever 7 Pro
What Edge 60 Neo does better (11) and where RugOne Xever 7 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display7.2
9.0Camera6.3
9.6Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 60 NeoRugOne Xever 7 Pro
| Edge 60 Neo | RugOne Xever 7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154.1 mm | 173.6 mm | −19.5 mm |
| Width | 71.2 mm | 84.4 mm | −13.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 14.1 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 174 g | 325 g | −150 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 60 Neo better than RugOne Xever 7 Pro?
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 500 nits6×
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: No
- Weight174 g vs 325 g+86%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: No
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 395 ppi+16%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 14.1 mm+74%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is RugOne Xever 7 Pro better than Edge 60 Neo?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,550 mAh+11%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 325 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 14.1 mm |
| Height | 154.1 mm | 173.6 mm |
| Width | 71.2 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Pantone: Latte, Frostbite, Poinciana, Grisaille | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,114 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.9% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 964,392 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,051 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 76% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
