- android.gs
- Compare
- 22 vs Galaxy S25 FE
Meizu 22 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
What 22 does better (13) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display8.1
9.0Performance7.9
9.4Camera9.3
9.4Battery4.8
8.1Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
22Galaxy S25 FE
| 22 | Galaxy S25 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152 mm | 161.3 mm | −9.3 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 76.6 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 190 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 22 better than Galaxy S25 FE?
- AnTuTu score2,454,886 vs 1,521,140+61%
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,900 nits3.2×
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,510 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+12%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
- Wireless charging power66 W vs 15 W4.4×
- Pixel density465 ppi vs 385 ppi+21%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than 22?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- eSIMNo · 22: Yes
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 152 mm | 161.3 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 465 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,247 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Exynos 2400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Xclipse 940 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,454,886 | 1,521,140 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,903 | 6,948 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,262 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,510 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0/3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.54 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS 2 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 43 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsXiaomi Poco X7 Pro8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S258.98.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsInfinix Note 50 Pro+8.98.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S24 FE8.98.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Pova 7 Ultra8.99.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsTecno Camon 40 Premier8.98.8

