- android.gs
- Compare
- 20 Pro vs V29 Pro
Meizu 20 Pro vs Vivo V29 Pro
What 20 Pro does better (11) and where V29 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
20 ProV29 Pro
| 20 Pro | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.2 mm | = |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.4 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 188 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 20 Pro better than V29 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · V29 Pro: No
- NFCYes · V29 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · V29 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,300 nits+38%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Pixel density515 ppi vs 453 ppi+14%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%
Why is V29 Pro better than 20 Pro?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight209 g vs 188 g+11%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Gray, Gold, Silver | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 515 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 90.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 83% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 10 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
