- android.gs
- Compare
- 20 Classic vs V27
Meizu 20 Classic vs Vivo V27
What 20 Classic does better (11) and where V27 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display7.7
9.1Camera9.1
6.2Battery5.7
7.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
20 ClassicV27
| 20 Classic | V27 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.9 mm | 164.1 mm | −6.2 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 74.8 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 180 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 20 Classic better than V27?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · V27: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+2%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+14%
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 388 ppi+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
Why is V27 better than 20 Classic?
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,000 nits+25%
- 4K selfie videoNo · 20 Classic: Yes
- Weight190 g vs 180 g+6%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.4 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 157.9 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Gray, Silver, Green | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,055 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 613,641 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,400 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,158 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 10 | Funtouch 13 |
