- android.gs
- Compare
- V60 ThinQ 5G vs NEX 3S 5G
LG V60 ThinQ 5G vs Vivo NEX 3S 5G
What V60 ThinQ 5G does better (12) and where NEX 3S 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display7.0
9.0Camera7.4
6.7Battery4.8
8.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
V60 ThinQ 5GNEX 3S 5G
| V60 ThinQ 5G | NEX 3S 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.3 mm | 167.4 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 220 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V60 ThinQ 5G better than NEX 3S 5G?
- Optical stabilisationYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Memory card slotYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · NEX 3S 5G: No
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 363 ppi+9%
- Weight213 g vs 220 g+3%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 9.4 mm+6%
Why is NEX 3S 5G better than V60 ThinQ 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Telephoto cameraNo · V60 ThinQ 5G: Yes
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.6% vs 93.6%+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 169.3 mm | 167.4 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Classy Blue, Classy White | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,256 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 363 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 616 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 93.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 955,113 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,494 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,116 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | LG UX | Funtouch 10.0 |
