- android.gs
- Compare
- V60 ThinQ 5G vs Aquos R5G
LG V60 ThinQ 5G vs Sharp Aquos R5G
What V60 ThinQ 5G does better (9) and where Aquos R5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display6.7
9.0Camera8.2
8.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
V60 ThinQ 5GAquos R5G
| V60 ThinQ 5G | Aquos R5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.3 mm | 162 mm | +7.3 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 213 g | 189 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V60 ThinQ 5G better than Aquos R5G?
- Main camera64 MP vs 12 MP5.3×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 3,730 mAh+34%
- OLED panelYes · Aquos R5G: No
- Memory card slotYes · Aquos R5G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R5G: No
- Dual SIMYes · Aquos R5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Aquos R5G: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.6% vs 81.9%+2%
Why is Aquos R5G better than V60 ThinQ 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Telephoto cameraNo · V60 ThinQ 5G: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 544 ppi+38%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight213 g vs 189 g+13%
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 169.3 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP6X |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Classy Blue, Classy White | Glare Black, Aurora White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | IGZO IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 3,168 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 544 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 616 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 81.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 955,113 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,494 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,116 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,730 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Front |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | LG UX | — |
