- android.gs
- Compare
- V60 ThinQ 5G UW vs Black Shark 3 Pro
LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
What V60 ThinQ 5G UW does better (8) and where Black Shark 3 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display7.4
9.0Camera8.0
7.3Battery7.8
8.9Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
V60 ThinQ 5G UWBlack Shark 3 Pro
| V60 ThinQ 5G UW | Black Shark 3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.3 mm | 177.8 mm | −8.5 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 83.3 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 10.1 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 253 g | −35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V60 ThinQ 5G UW better than Black Shark 3 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 3 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Black Shark 3 Pro: No
- Memory card slotYes · Black Shark 3 Pro: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoYes · Black Shark 3 Pro: No
- Weight218 g vs 253 g+16%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 10.1 mm+13%
Why is Black Shark 3 Pro better than V60 ThinQ 5G UW?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 484 ppi+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 20 MP2×
- Dual SIMNo · V60 ThinQ 5G UW: Yes
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7.1″+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 253 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 10.1 mm |
| Height | 169.3 mm | 177.8 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 83.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Classy Blue, Classy White | Phantom Black, Armor Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7.1″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 484 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 83.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 79% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.85 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
