- android.gs
- Compare
- 8 vs Black Shark 3 Pro
OnePlus 8 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
What 8 does better (7) and where Black Shark 3 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display7.4
8.3Camera8.0
3.2Battery7.8
8.7Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
8Black Shark 3 Pro
| 8 | Black Shark 3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 177.8 mm | −17.6 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 83.3 mm | −10.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 253 g | −73 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 8 better than Black Shark 3 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 500 nits2.6×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 3 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Black Shark 3 Pro: No
- Weight180 g vs 253 g+41%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Thickness8 mm vs 10.1 mm+26%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.7% vs 83.6%+6%
Why is Black Shark 3 Pro better than 8?
- Wired charging30 W vs 65 W2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · 8: Yes
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density402 ppi vs 484 ppi+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 8: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 7.1″+8%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Charged in 30 min68% vs 79%+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 253 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10.1 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 177.8 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 83.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Aluminium |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Onyx Black, Glacial Green, Interstellar Glow, Polar Silver | Phantom Black, Armor Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 7.1″ |
| Panel | Fluid AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 484 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 803 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 83.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 564,708 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 13,291 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,116 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OxygenOS 13 | — |
