- android.gs
- Compare
- DuraForce Ultra vs X70 Pro+
Kyocera DuraForce Ultra vs Vivo X70 Pro+
What DuraForce Ultra does better (2) and where X70 Pro+ wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Display8.7
5.2Camera9.7
4.9Battery6.9
8.4Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
DuraForce UltraX70 Pro+
| DuraForce Ultra | X70 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.1 mm | 164.5 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 8.9 mm | +7.1 mm |
| Weight | 278 g | 209 g | +69 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DuraForce Ultra better than X70 Pro+?
- Memory card slotYes · X70 Pro+: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X70 Pro+: No
Why is X70 Pro+ better than DuraForce Ultra?
- Main camera24 MP vs 50 MP2.1×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · DuraForce Ultra: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · DuraForce Ultra: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · DuraForce Ultra: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Weight278 g vs 209 g+33%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
- Screen size5.4″ vs 6.8″+24%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 278 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 165.1 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Sapphire Shield | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 443 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,022 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 62% | 90.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 837,833 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,469 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 24 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | — | 55 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch OS 14 (International) |
