- android.gs
- Compare
- DuraForce Pro 3 vs Reno8 T
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3 vs OPPO Reno8 T
What DuraForce Pro 3 does better (10) and where Reno8 T wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display6.9
6.3Camera6.6
3.1Battery6.0
9.6Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
DuraForce Pro 3Reno8 T
| DuraForce Pro 3 | Reno8 T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154 mm | 160.8 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 73.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +6.7 mm |
| Weight | 237 g | 180 g | +57 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DuraForce Pro 3 better than Reno8 T?
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno8 T: No
- 5GYes · Reno8 T: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Reno8 T: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Reno8 T: No
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 409 ppi+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
Why is Reno8 T better than DuraForce Pro 3?
- Main camera64 MP vs 100 MP+56%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,270 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+17%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Weight237 g vs 180 g+32%
- Dual SIMNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
- Screen size5.4″ vs 6.4″+20%
- Thickness14.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+86%
- Screen-to-body ratio64.7% vs 84.1%+30%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 237 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 154 mm | 160.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Shatter-Resistant Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Black Starlight, Orange Sunset |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.4″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 64.7% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 534,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,978 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 378 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 100 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 24 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,270 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 14 |
