- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero X Pro vs Moto G40 Fusion
Infinix Zero X Pro vs Motorola Moto G40 Fusion
What Zero X Pro does better (11) and where Moto G40 Fusion wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.2
9.7Camera8.0
4.9Battery7.3
2.9Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero X ProMoto G40 Fusion
| Zero X Pro | Moto G40 Fusion | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 169.6 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9.7 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 225 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero X Pro better than Moto G40 Fusion?
- Wired charging45 W vs 20 W2.2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · Moto G40 Fusion: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Moto G40 Fusion: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Moto G40 Fusion: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight193 g vs 225 g+17%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 9.7 mm+24%
Why is Moto G40 Fusion better than Zero X Pro?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
- NFCNo · Zero X Pro: Yes
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+12%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9.7 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 169.6 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 515 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 85.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 313,652 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,674 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 20 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | — |
