- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero X Pro vs Edge 20 Lite
Infinix Zero X Pro vs Motorola Edge 20 Lite
What Zero X Pro does better (12) and where Edge 20 Lite wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.2
9.7Camera7.6
4.9Battery5.5
2.9Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero X ProEdge 20 Lite
| Zero X Pro | Edge 20 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165.9 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 185 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero X Pro better than Edge 20 Lite?
- Wired charging45 W vs 30 W+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Edge 20 Lite: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Edge 20 Lite: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Edge 20 Lite: No
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2 GHz+2%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Edge 20 Lite better than Zero X Pro?
- NFCNo · Zero X Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Weight193 g vs 185 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Electric Graphite, Lagoon Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 515 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 87.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | 313,652 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,674 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | — |
