- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Flip vs Phantom V Fold2
Infinix Zero Flip vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2
What Zero Flip does better (6) and where Phantom V Fold2 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display6.3
5.6Camera5.8
6.1Battery7.0
3.4Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero FlipPhantom V Fold2
| Zero Flip | Phantom V Fold2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.4 mm | 159 mm | +11.4 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 140.4 mm | −67 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 6.1 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 249 g | −54 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Flip better than Phantom V Fold2?
- Active use (test)11 h vs 9.6 h+15%
- Weight195 g vs 249 g+28%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 388 ppi+6%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -27.1 LUFS+-9%
Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than Zero Flip?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+22%
- Telephoto cameraNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+23%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Screen size6.9″ vs 7.8″+14%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 2,000 px+85%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 6.1 mm+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 6.1 mm |
| Height | 170.4 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 140.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Karst Green, Rippling Blue |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 2,000 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,296 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 573 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 88.2% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,158,040 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,327 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,559 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 5,750 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 11 h | 9.6 h |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | HiOS 14 Fold |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 2 |
