android.gs
Compare
Zero Flip vs Razr 50 Ultra

Infinix Zero Flip vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

What Zero Flip does better (4) and where Razr 50 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2024Zero Flip

6.1Score

4 advantages≈ $630

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

16 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

4.5Display9.1

5.6Camera5.7

6.1Battery5.2

3.4Features6.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Zero FlipRazr 50 Ultra

	Zero Flip	Razr 50 Ultra	Difference
Height	170.4 mm	171.4 mm	−1 mm
Width	73.4 mm	74 mm	−0.6 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	7.1 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	195 g	189 g	+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Zero Flip better than Razr 50 Ultra?

Wired charging70 W vs 45 W+56%
Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr 50 Ultra: No
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Zero Flip?

Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,000 nits2.1×
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Telephoto cameraNo · Zero Flip: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Zero Flip: Yes
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
Major OS updates promised2 vs 3+50%
Active use (test)11 h vs 12.1 h+10%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
Weight195 g vs 189 g+3%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix Zero Flip≈ $6306.1	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9
Design
Weight	195 g	189 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	7.1 mm
Height	170.4 mm	171.4 mm
Width	73.4 mm	74 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	—	IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Rock Black, Blossom Glow	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	413 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.1%	84.9%
HDR	—	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8020	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Adreno 735
AnTuTu score	—	1,140,567
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	4,441
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	2,567
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,720 mAh	4,000 mAh
Active use (test)	11 h	12.1 h
Wired charging	70 W	45 W
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.6 LUFS	-22.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 14.5	—
Major OS updates promised	2	3