- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero Flip vs Razr 2022
Infinix Zero Flip vs Motorola Razr 2022
What Zero Flip does better (11) and where Razr 2022 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero FlipRazr 2022
| Zero Flip | Razr 2022 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.4 mm | 167 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 79.8 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 195 g | 200 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Flip better than Razr 2022?
- Wired charging70 W vs 30 W2.3×
- Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+35%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Razr 2022: No
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 393 ppi+5%
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Weight195 g vs 200 g+3%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.1% vs 81.3%+6%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -25.4 LUFS+-3%
Why is Razr 2022 better than Zero Flip?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+23%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMNo · Zero Flip: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 170.4 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 79.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Satin Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,033 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 81.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 965,260 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,944 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | — | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
