- android.gs
- Compare
- Zero 30 vs Reno11 Pro (China)
Infinix Zero 30 vs OPPO Reno11 Pro (China)
What Zero 30 does better (7) and where Reno11 Pro (China) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display8.8
9.3Camera8.8
7.3Battery6.4
6.3Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero 30Reno11 Pro (China)
| Zero 30 | Reno11 Pro (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 163 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 190 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero 30 better than Reno11 Pro (China)?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+6%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight185 g vs 190 g+3%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Why is Reno11 Pro (China) better than Zero 30?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Zero 30: Yes
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,600 nits+68%
- Wired charging68 W vs 80 W+18%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+23%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 451 ppi+16%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 136%+70%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,240 px+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple | Black, Green, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 451 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 764 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,016 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,952 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | ColorOS 14 |
