- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 40X 5G vs Reno12 F 4G
Infinix Note 40X 5G vs OPPO Reno12 F 4G
What Note 40X 5G does better (6) and where Reno12 F 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display8.6
5.6Camera6.8
4.6Battery6.8
7.1Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 40X 5GReno12 F 4G
| Note 40X 5G | Reno12 F 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.9 mm | 163.1 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 187 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 40X 5G better than Reno12 F 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- NFCYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than Note 40X 5G?
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Note 40X 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Note 40X 5G: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 40X 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Weight201 g vs 187 g+7%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.7 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.5% vs 86.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 168.9 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Palm Blue, Lime Green, Starlit Black | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 86.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 431,840 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,468 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | ColorOS 15 |
