- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 40 Pro+ vs Y200 Pro
Infinix Note 40 Pro+ vs Vivo Y200 Pro
What Note 40 Pro+ does better (10) and where Y200 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display8.3
4.6Performance4.6
8.1Camera7.7
6.2Battery6.5
5.6Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 40 Pro+Y200 Pro
| Note 40 Pro+ | Y200 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 172 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 40 Pro+ better than Y200 Pro?
- Wired charging100 W vs 44 W2.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Wireless chargingYes · Y200 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Y200 Pro: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is Y200 Pro better than Note 40 Pro+?
- AnTuTu score459,546 vs 561,575+22%
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- Weight190 g vs 172 g+10%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Obsidian Black, Vintage Green, Racing Edition | Silk black, Silk green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,130 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 90.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 459,546 | 561,575 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,233 | 2,201 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 125% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
