- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 40 Pro+ vs C75 4G
Infinix Note 40 Pro+ vs Realme C75 4G
What Note 40 Pro+ does better (17) and where C75 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display5.5
8.1Camera4.6
6.2Battery8.2
5.6Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 40 Pro+C75 4G
| Note 40 Pro+ | C75 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 165.7 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.2 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 196 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 40 Pro+ better than C75 4G?
- Wired charging100 W vs 45 W2.2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · C75 4G: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · C75 4G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · C75 4G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · C75 4G: No
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 690 nits+88%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Why is C75 4G better than Note 40 Pro+?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+30%
- Memory card slotNo · Note 40 Pro+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | ArmorShell glass |
| Colours | Obsidian Black, Vintage Green, Racing Edition | Gold, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 690 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,130 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 86.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 | Mediatek Helio G92 Max |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 459,546 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,233 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 12.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 125% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
