- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 30 Pro vs T2 (India)
Infinix Note 30 Pro vs Vivo T2 (India)
What Note 30 Pro does better (13) and where T2 (India) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
6.6Camera7.7
7.6Battery4.8
4.1Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 30 ProT2 (India)
| Note 30 Pro | T2 (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 158.9 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 73.5 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 172 g | +31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 30 Pro better than T2 (India)?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Wired charging68 W vs 44 W+55%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · T2 (India): No
- NFCYes · T2 (India): No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 60%+33%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 84.1%+3%
Why is T2 (India) better than Note 30 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 30 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · Note 30 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,300 nits+44%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- Weight203 g vs 172 g+18%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 413 ppi+5%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Magic Black, Variable Gold | Nitro Blaze, Velocity Wave |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,269 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,975 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 347 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | Funtouch 13 |
