- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro+ 4G vs Poco C75
Infinix Hot 50 Pro+ 4G vs Xiaomi Poco C75
What Hot 50 Pro+ 4G does better (15) and where Poco C75 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display5.9
3.8Performance2.8
5.2Camera5.2
3.9Battery6.3
4.2Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro+ 4GPoco C75
| Hot 50 Pro+ 4G | Poco C75 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 171.9 mm | −7.8 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.2 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 162 g | 204 g | −42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro+ 4G better than Poco C75?
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 600 nits2.2×
- AnTuTu score436,283 vs 344,773+27%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,957 vs 1,330+47%
- OLED panelYes · Poco C75: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C75: No
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 260 ppi+51%
- Charged in 30 min58% vs 25%2.3×
- Weight162 g vs 204 g+26%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Poco C75 better than Hot 50 Pro+ 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Hot 50 Pro+ 4G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 162 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Dreamy Purple | Black, Green, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,190 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 436,283 | 344,773 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,957 | 1,330 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
