- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 4G vs Hot 50 Pro+ 4G
Infinix Hot 50 4G vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro+ 4G
What Hot 50 4G does better (2) and where Hot 50 Pro+ 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display8.4
4.4Performance3.8
4.6Camera5.2
4.6Battery3.9
5.0Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 4GHot 50 Pro+ 4G
| Hot 50 4G | Hot 50 Pro+ 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.9 mm | 164.1 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 74.4 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 6.8 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 162 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 4G better than Hot 50 Pro+ 4G?
- AnTuTu score566,585 vs 436,283+30%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Hot 50 Pro+ 4G: No
Why is Hot 50 Pro+ 4G better than Hot 50 4G?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- OLED panelNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,300 nits+62%
- Weight187 g vs 162 g+15%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 58%+53%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 6.8 mm+13%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86% vs 90%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 162 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 167.9 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Sage Green, Titanium Grey | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Dreamy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,190 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 566,585 | 436,283 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,961 | 1,957 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.9 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 1 |
