- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro+ 4G vs A40M
Infinix Hot 50 Pro+ 4G vs OPPO A40M
What Hot 50 Pro+ 4G does better (13) and where A40M wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display5.3
5.2Camera4.1
3.9Battery7.7
4.2Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro+ 4GA40M
| Hot 50 Pro+ 4G | A40M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165.8 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76.1 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 162 g | 186 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro+ 4G better than A40M?
- OLED panelYes · A40M: No
- NFCYes · A40M: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 264 ppi+49%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits+30%
- Weight162 g vs 186 g+15%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz+5%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min58% vs 50%+16%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.7 mm+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is A40M better than Hot 50 Pro+ 4G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 162 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Dreamy Purple | Sparkle Black, Starlight White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,190 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 436,283 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,957 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 10.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | ColorOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
