- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 4G vs Moto G75
Infinix Hot 50 4G vs Motorola Moto G75
What Hot 50 4G does better (5) and where Moto G75 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 4GMoto G75
| Hot 50 4G | Moto G75 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.9 mm | 166.1 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 77.2 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 4G better than Moto G75?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Moto G75: No
- Weight187 g vs 205 g+10%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 387 ppi+2%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.3 mm+8%
Why is Moto G75 better than Hot 50 4G?
- AnTuTu score566,585 vs 790,810+40%
- Wired charging18 W vs 30 W+67%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,961 vs 2,920+49%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- 5GNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,000 nits+25%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 50 4G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 167.9 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Sage Green, Titanium Grey | Charcoal Gray, Aqua Blue, Succulent Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,388 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 566,585 | 790,810 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,961 | 2,920 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 49 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
