- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 30 vs Pova Slim
Infinix GT 30 vs Tecno Pova Slim
What GT 30 does better (12) and where Pova Slim wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 30Pova Slim
| GT 30 | Pova Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 156 g | +31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 30 better than Pova Slim?
- AnTuTu score963,424 vs 613,165+57%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,185 vs 1,988+60%
- Stereo speakersYes · Pova Slim: No
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+7%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Slim: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Pova Slim: No
- Dual SIMYes · Pova Slim: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Pova Slim better than GT 30?
- Weight187 g vs 156 g+20%
- Thickness8 mm vs 6 mm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Pulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade White | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,578 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 89.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 963,424 | 613,165 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,185 | 1,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
