- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate Xs vs Razr 5G
Huawei Mate Xs vs Motorola Razr 5G
What Mate Xs does better (14) and where Razr 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate XsRazr 5G
| Mate Xs | Razr 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 169.2 mm | −7.9 mm |
| Width | 146.2 mm | 72.6 mm | +73.6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 7.9 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 300 g | 192 g | +108 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate Xs better than Razr 5G?
- Wired charging55 W vs 15 W3.7×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 2,800 mAh+61%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Razr 5G: No
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 876 px2.5×
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Screen size8″ vs 6.2″+29%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Razr 5G: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr 5G: No
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+19%
- Pixel density414 ppi vs 373 ppi+11%
Why is Razr 5G better than Mate Xs?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Main camera40 MP vs 48 MP+20%
- Weight300 g vs 192 g+56%
- eSIMNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 300 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 169.2 mm |
| Width | 146.2 mm | 72.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Glass |
| Colours | Interstellar Blue | Polished Graphite, Blush Gold, Liquid Mercury |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 6.2″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable P-OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 876 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,142 px |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 413 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 70.7% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 459,274 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,213 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 2,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 85% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10 | — |
