- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate 40E vs X60 Pro
Huawei Mate 40E vs Vivo X60 Pro
What Mate 40E does better (9) and where X60 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 40EX60 Pro
| Mate 40E | X60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 158.6 mm | = |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 73.2 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 179 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 40E better than X60 Pro?
- Wireless chargingYes · X60 Pro: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Memory card slotYes · X60 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · X60 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X60 Pro: No
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is X60 Pro better than Mate 40E?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 40E: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+12%
- Weight188 g vs 179 g+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.5+27%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 7.6 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Silver, White, Black | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990E 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP14 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 639,612 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,490 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.53 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | Funtouch 11.1 |
