- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate 40 vs Aquos Zero 2
Huawei Mate 40 vs Sharp Aquos Zero 2
What Mate 40 does better (17) and where Aquos Zero 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display8.4
8.2Camera7.1
5.7Battery2.5
6.3Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 40Aquos Zero 2
| Mate 40 | Aquos Zero 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 158 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 74 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 188 g | 141 g | +47 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 40 better than Aquos Zero 2?
- Main camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.1×
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 3,130 mAh+34%
- Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos Zero 2: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Aquos Zero 2: No
- Memory card slotYes · Aquos Zero 2: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos Zero 2: No
- Dual SIMYes · Aquos Zero 2: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Aquos Zero 2: No
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is Aquos Zero 2 better than Mate 40?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 240 Hz2.7×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 40: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Mate 40: Yes
- Weight188 g vs 141 g+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 141 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000E 5G | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 640 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 3,130 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 40 W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | — |
