How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Mate 40 Pro vs Aquos R5G

Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R5G

What Mate 40 Pro does better (13) and where Aquos R5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Huawei · 2020Mate 40 Pro
8.7Score
13 advantages≈ $850
Higher score
vs
Sharp Aquos R5G
Sharp · 2020Aquos R5G
8.4Score
11 advantages≈ $760
7.8Display6.7
9.0Camera8.2
9.5Features8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate 40 ProAquos R5G
75.5 × 162.99.175 × 1628.9
Mate 40 ProAquos R5GDifference
Height162.9 mm162 mm+0.9 mm
Width75.5 mm75 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness9.1 mm8.9 mm+0.2 mm
Weight212 g189 g+23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate 40 Pro better than Aquos R5G?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 12 MP4.2×
  2. Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
  3. OLED panelYes · Aquos R5G: No
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 3,730 mAh+18%
  6. Memory card slotYes · Aquos R5G: No
  7. 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R5G: No
  8. eSIMYes · Aquos R5G: No
  9. Dual SIMYes · Aquos R5G: No
  10. CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+10%
  11. Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
  12. Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%

Why is Aquos R5G better than Mate 40 Pro?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  2. Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 40 Pro: Yes
  3. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Max video4K vs 8K
  6. Pixel density456 ppi vs 544 ppi+19%
  7. Weight212 g vs 189 g+12%
  8. Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
  10. Resolution (width)1,344 px vs 1,440 px+7%
  11. Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Sharp Aquos R5GSharp Aquos R5G≈ $7608.4
Design
Weight212 g189 g
Thickness9.1 mm8.9 mm
Height162.9 mm162 mm
Width75.5 mm75 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP68IP6X
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursMystic Silver, White, Black, Green, YellowGlare Black, Aurora White
Display
Screen size6.8″6.4″
PanelOLEDIGZO IPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,344 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,772 px3,168 px
Pixel density456 ppi544 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Measured brightness807 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio94.1%81.9%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin 9000 5GQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process5 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.13 GHz2.84 GHz
GPUMali-G78 MP24Adreno 650
AnTuTu score686,835—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,704—
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP12 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.28"—
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,400 mAh3,730 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Ion
Wired charging66 W—
Wireless chargingYes—
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.13.1
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.9 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayFront
3D face unlockYes—
BarometerYes—
SensorsFace ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 10Android 10
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceEMUI 11—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare