- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate 30E Pro 5G vs X50 Pro+
Huawei Mate 30E Pro 5G vs Vivo X50 Pro+
What Mate 30E Pro 5G does better (7) and where X50 Pro+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display7.7
9.1Camera9.7
5.8Battery4.2
7.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 30E Pro 5GX50 Pro+
| Mate 30E Pro 5G | X50 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.1 mm | 158.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 73 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 198 g | 192 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 30E Pro 5G better than X50 Pro+?
- Wireless chargingYes · X50 Pro+: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,350 mAh+3%
- Memory card slotYes · X50 Pro+: No
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 398 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
- Resolution (width)1,176 px vs 1,080 px+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio94.1% vs 90.4%+4%
Why is X50 Pro+ better than Mate 30E Pro 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Main camera40 MP vs 50 MP+25%
- Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
- Wired charging40 W vs 44 W+10%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Weight198 g vs 192 g+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 158.1 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 73 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Space Silver, Cosmic Purple, Emerald Green, Orange, Forest Green | Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,176 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 94.1% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990E 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP14 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 621,433 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,411 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 27 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | Funtouch 10.5 |
