- android.gs
- Compare
- U24 Pro vs Reno11 F
HTC U24 Pro vs OPPO Reno11 F
What U24 Pro does better (14) and where Reno11 F wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
U24 ProReno11 F
| U24 Pro | Reno11 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.1 mm | 161.1 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 74.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 177 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is U24 Pro better than Reno11 F?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- AnTuTu score1,016,461 vs 841,497+21%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Reno11 F: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Reno11 F: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno11 F: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,380 vs 2,398+41%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno11 F: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Reno11 F better than U24 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging60 W vs 67 W+12%
- 4K selfie videoNo · U24 Pro: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 177 g+12%
- Thickness9 mm vs 7.5 mm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 167.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Panda glass |
| Colours | Space Blue, Twilight White | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.3% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,016,461 | 841,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,380 | 2,398 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 15 |
