- android.gs
- Compare
- X9c vs iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Honor X9c vs Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
What X9c does better (6) and where iQOO Neo9S Pro+ wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.2
6.0Performance8.8
8.5Camera8.9
9.0Battery9.0
7.4Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9ciQOO Neo9S Pro+
| X9c | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 189 g | 193 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9c better than iQOO Neo9S Pro+?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,400 nits2.9×
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Weight189 g vs 193 g+2%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro+ better than X9c?
- AnTuTu score760,332 vs 2,342,4333.1×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,719 vs 6,3342.3×
- Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+50%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 124%3.3×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 453 ppi+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Titanium Purple, Titanium Black, Jade Cyan | Blue/White, Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 760,332 | 2,342,433 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,719 | 6,334 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,939 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 124% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | OriginOS 6 |
