- android.gs
- Compare
- X9c vs 14T
Honor X9c vs Xiaomi 14T
What X9c does better (3) and where 14T wins (19) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9c14T
| X9c | 14T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 160.5 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.1 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 193 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9c better than 14T?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+32%
- Weight189 g vs 193 g+2%
Why is 14T better than X9c?
- AnTuTu score760,332 vs 1,253,994+65%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,719 vs 3,989+47%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · X9c: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+52%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X9c: Yes
- eSIMNo · X9c: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Purple, Titanium Black, Jade Cyan | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black, Lemon Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,355 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 89.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 760,332 | 1,253,994 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,719 | 3,989 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,942 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.5 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.98 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
