- android.gs
- Compare
- X9c vs Pova 6 Pro
Honor X9c vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro
What X9c does better (16) and where Pova 6 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display8.4
6.0Performance4.1
8.5Camera6.6
9.0Battery8.2
7.4Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9cPova 6 Pro
| X9c | Pova 6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 165.5 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76.1 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 198 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9c better than Pova 6 Pro?
- AnTuTu score760,332 vs 390,556+95%
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,719 vs 1,890+44%
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+10%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx3+67%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 6 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 393 ppi+11%
- Weight189 g vs 198 g+5%
Why is Pova 6 Pro better than X9c?
- Wired charging66 W vs 70 W+6%
- Memory card slotNo · X9c: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X9c: Yes
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 75%+97%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 165.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Titanium Purple, Titanium Black, Jade Cyan | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,070 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 760,332 | 390,556 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,719 | 1,890 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 373 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.4 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | HIOS 14 |
