- android.gs
- Compare
- X9c vs Galaxy F54
Honor X9c vs Samsung Galaxy F54
What X9c does better (10) and where Galaxy F54 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display8.2
8.5Camera8.8
9.0Battery8.4
7.4Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9cGalaxy F54
| X9c | Galaxy F54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.9 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9c better than Galaxy F54?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F54: No
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+10%
- Pixel density437 ppi vs 393 ppi+11%
- Weight189 g vs 199 g+5%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.7% vs 85%+7%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
Why is Galaxy F54 better than X9c?
- Memory card slotNo · X9c: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X9c: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | Titanium Purple, Titanium Black, Jade Cyan | Meteor Blue, Stardust Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 85% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 760,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,719 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | One UI 5.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
