- android.gs
- Compare
- X9c vs F27 Pro+
Honor X9c vs OPPO F27 Pro+
What X9c does better (15) and where F27 Pro+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9cF27 Pro+
| X9c | F27 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 177 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9c better than F27 Pro+?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 950 nits4.2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+32%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · F27 Pro+: No
- NFCYes · F27 Pro+: No
- Stereo speakersYes · F27 Pro+: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · F27 Pro+: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
Why is F27 Pro+ better than X9c?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx9+80%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 84%2.2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X9c: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Weight189 g vs 177 g+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Titanium Purple, Titanium Black, Jade Cyan | Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 950 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 89.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 760,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,719 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 84% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.97 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | ColorOS 14 |
