- android.gs
- Compare
- X9a vs Redmi Note 12T Pro
Honor X9a vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
What X9a does better (5) and where Redmi Note 12T Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.0
4.8Performance7.8
6.9Camera7.2
7.5Battery8.0
7.1Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9aRedmi Note 12T Pro
| X9a | Redmi Note 12T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 163.6 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 200 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9a better than Redmi Note 12T Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 650 nits+23%
- Weight175 g vs 200 g+14%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.9 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 85.1%+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12T Pro better than X9a?
- AnTuTu score605,759 vs 1,207,095+99%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,057 vs 4,2222.1×
- Wired charging40 W vs 67 W+68%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · X9a: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X9a: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 407 ppi+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Blue, White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | 859 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 605,759 | 1,207,095 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,057 | 4,222 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, ultrasound proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | MIUI 14 |
