- android.gs
- Compare
- X9a vs Power Armor 20WT
Honor X9a vs UleFone Power Armor 20WT
What X9a does better (11) and where Power Armor 20WT wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display4.0
6.9Camera5.5
7.5Battery8.7
7.1Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9aPower Armor 20WT
| X9a | Power Armor 20WT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.8 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 79.2 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18.1 mm | −10.2 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 382 g | −207 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9a better than Power Armor 20WT?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Weight175 g vs 382 g2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor 20WT: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Wired charging40 W vs 33 W+21%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 18.1 mm2.3×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Power Armor 20WT: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5.6″+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 63.1%+42%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
Why is Power Armor 20WT better than X9a?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 10,850 mAh2.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · X9a: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 427 ppi+8%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 382 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18.1 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 859 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 63.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 605,759 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,057 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 10,850 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 57% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | — |
