- android.gs
- Compare
- X9 vs Poco X4 GT
Honor X9 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
What X9 does better (6) and where Poco X4 GT wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display7.0
6.9Camera7.2
5.8Battery8.0
4.1Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9Poco X4 GT
| X9 | Poco X4 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.6 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 200 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9 better than Poco X4 GT?
- Weight189 g vs 200 g+6%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Charged in 30 min81% vs 65%+25%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 85.1%+5%
Why is Poco X4 GT better than X9?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · X9: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X9: Yes
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,080 mAh+6%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X9: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.85 GHz+19%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 407 ppi+6%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IPX2 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 747,871 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,719 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,518 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 81% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.2 | MIUI 13 for POCO |
