- android.gs
- Compare
- X9 5G vs Poco F4
Honor X9 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F4
What X9 5G does better (6) and where Poco F4 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9 5GPoco F4
| X9 5G | Poco F4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.2 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9 5G better than Poco F4?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Weight189 g vs 195 g+3%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 86.6%+3%
- Charged in 30 min81% vs 79%+3%
Why is Poco F4 better than X9 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+45%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IPX2 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,003 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 86.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 590,961 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,190 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,232 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 81% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.2 | MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
