- android.gs
- Compare
- X9 5G vs Pova 4 Pro
Honor X9 5G vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What X9 5G does better (10) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display6.3
5.0Camera4.6
5.8Battery8.2
5.6Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9 5GPova 4 Pro
| X9 5G | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 164.8 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 211 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9 5G better than Pova 4 Pro?
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight189 g vs 211 g+12%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Charged in 30 min81% vs 62%+31%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 9.2 mm+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 83%+7%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than X9 5G?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+25%
- OLED panelNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X9 5G: Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 403 ppi+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IPX2 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 81% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 4.2 | HiOS 8.6 |
