- android.gs
- Compare
- X8b vs Moto G54 Power
Honor X8b vs Motorola Moto G54 Power
What X8b does better (12) and where Moto G54 Power wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display5.8
3.6Performance4.2
7.6Camera8.0
4.2Battery7.3
3.5Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8bMoto G54 Power
| X8b | Moto G54 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.6 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 73.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 192 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8b better than Moto G54 Power?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 560 nits3.6×
- OLED panelYes · Moto G54 Power: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Weight166 g vs 192 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 8.9 mm+31%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 45%+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 85.5%+5%
Why is Moto G54 Power better than X8b?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · X8b: Yes
- 5GNo · X8b: Yes
- NFCNo · X8b: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X8b: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- AnTuTu score396,111 vs 432,772+9%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,475 vs 1,918+30%
- Memory card slotNo · X8b: Yes
- eSIMNo · X8b: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X8b: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.6 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Glamorous Green, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black, Blue | Midnight Blue, Pearl Blue, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 560 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 489 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 85.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 396,111 | 432,772 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,475 | 1,918 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.9 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | Hello UI |
