- android.gs
- Compare
- X7c vs Galaxy A17 4G
Honor X7c vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
What X7c does better (10) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
7.0Display7.0
4.8Performance4.3
4.1Camera7.8
7.6Battery5.3
6.2Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7cGalaxy A17 4G
| X7c | Galaxy A17 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 164.4 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 190 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7c better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
- Wired charging35 W vs 25 W+40%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- AnTuTu score571,597 vs 526,972+8%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,104 vs 2,052+3%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 800 nits+6%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than X7c?
- OLED panelNo · X7c: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7c: Yes
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Memory card slotNo · X7c: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X7c: Yes
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.5 mm+9%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Moonlight White, Forest Green | Black, Gray, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,597 | 526,972 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,104 | 2,052 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 52 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
