- android.gs
- Compare
- X50 GT vs Camon 30 5G
Honor X50 GT vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
What X50 GT does better (13) and where Camon 30 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.6
6.2Camera8.0
7.9Battery7.3
6.3Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50 GTCamon 30 5G
| X50 GT | Camon 30 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 165.4 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 GT better than Camon 30 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 393 ppi+10%
- Weight192 g vs 199 g+4%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 5G better than X50 GT?
- Wired charging35 W vs 70 W2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X50 GT: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- Memory card slotNo · X50 GT: Yes
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Emerald Lake Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.2% | 87.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 723,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7.2 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
