- android.gs
- Compare
- X40 GT vs Camon 19 Pro 5G
Honor X40 GT vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
What X40 GT does better (8) and where Camon 19 Pro 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.3
6.1Camera7.7
5.8Battery6.0
7.9Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
X40 GTCamon 19 Pro 5G
| X40 GT | Camon 19 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 166.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X40 GT better than Camon 19 Pro 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 33 W2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Camon 19 Pro 5G better than X40 GT?
- Optical stabilisationNo · X40 GT: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Memory card slotNo · X40 GT: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X40 GT: Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 166.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Colours | Racing Black, Black, Silver | Eco Black, Cedar Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | HiOS 8.6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.47.5
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.47.5
vsGoogle Pixel 6avsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.57.5
vsNothing Phone (1)vsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.77.5
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+vsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G7.67.5
vsTecno Camon 20 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro 5G6.67.5